March 2012, Volume 98, Issue 1|
The End of Campaign Finance Law as We Knew It
98 Va. L. Rev. 1 (2012)
The Article argues that Citizens United v. FEC ended campaign finance law as we long knew it, but for reasons that have little to do with corporate electioneering. Although the public outcry and legal scholarship have focused on the decisionís narrow effect on corporations, the Article demonstrates how the decisionís broader logic transformed campaign finance law beyond corporate electioneering and led within months to the nearly complete de-regulation of independent expenditures in time for the 2010 elections. Last yearís elections provided only a glimpse of what the Article calls the reverse hydraulics of de-regulation, and as the Article argues, this new de-regulated world of campaign finance is not a better one.
Citizens United therefore is a clear turning point for not just campaign finance law, but for all regulation of the relationship between campaign money and the political process. However, the Article surprisingly concludes in the end that the Supreme Court actually may be sympathetic to alternate forms of regulation of political corruption, notwithstanding Citizens Unitedís broad skepticism about corruption. Namely, the Court may be much more sanguine toward government regulation of campaign moneyís influence when it is structured as ex post regulation of the legislative process on the back end, as opposed to the ex ante structure of campaign finance regulation. Citizens United, when considered in light of other recent Court decisions, point this way forward for campaign finance reform without campaign finance regulation.
Click on an icon below to access the full text of this article*
Westlaw | LexisNexis | HeinOnline | SSRN | Bloomberg
* These are third-party content providers; they may require a separate subscription or charge a fee for access.