October 2004, Volume 90, Issue 6
The Space Between School Desegregation Court Orders and Outcomes: The Struggle to Challenge White Privilege
by Amy Stuart Wells, Anita Tijerina Revilla, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Awo Korantemaa Atanda
90 Va. L. Rev. 1721 (2004)
View PDF 
This Essay reports on the results of a five-year study of six communities that tried to racially balance their public schools during the 1970s. This research reveals the details that lie between the court orders (or whatever desegregation policy existed) and the student outcome and demographic data that have been captured in quantitative analyses. In the space between the mandates of desegregation and the results, we found that the schools and communities often unwittingly reproduced racial inequality by maintaining white privilege within the context of desegregated schools. Yet at the same time, these schools provided spaces where students and educators crossed the color line in ways they had never done before and have not done since.
This Essay argues that the school desegregation policies that existed in these school districts, though better than nothing, simply were not enough to change the larger society single-handedly. It illustrates how difficult it was for the people in these schools to live up to the goals of school desegregation given the larger societal forces—including racial attitudes and politics, housing segregation, and economic inequality—working against them. It also documents how deeply committed some of these actors, both educators and students, were to trying to bring about change. In this way, the study speaks to larger lessons about the role of schools in society and the uphill but worthwhile efforts of lawyers and judges to use schools as one of very few tools for social change.
Racial inequality and the resultant segregation did not begin in the public schools; thus, we should not expect remedies in the public schools to solve the problem alone. But we can rely on racially diverse public schools—to the extent that current policies allow them to exist—to be important sites in the struggle for a more just society. Lawyers and legal scholars who helped fight for school desegregation and who continue to push for racial diversity in educational settings need to understand this more complex view of the history and reality of school desegregation in the United States in order to move forward with new legal strategies.
Click on an icon below to access the full text of this article*
 Westlaw |  LexisNexis |  HeinOnline |  SSRN |  Bloomberg
* These are third-party content providers; they may require a separate subscription or charge a fee for access.
|
|