Authority and Authorities

Essay — Volume 94, Issue 8

94 Va. L. Rev. 1931
Download PDF

Although there is a rich jurisprudential literature dealing with the concept of authority in law, the lessons from this jurisprudential tradition have never been connected with the practice by which authorities—cases, statutes, constitutions, regulations, articles, and books, primarily—are a central feature of common law legal argument, legal reasoning, and judicial decision-making. This disconnect between thinking about the nature of authority and reflecting on law’s use of authorities has become even more troublesome of late, because controversies about the citation of foreign law, the increasing use of no-citation and no-precedential-effect rules in federal and state courts, and even such seemingly trivial matters as whether lawyers, judges and legal scholars should cite or rely on Wikipedia all raise central questions about the idea of authority and its special place in legal reasoning. In seeking to close this gap between the jurisprudential lessons and their contemporary application, this Essay casts doubt on the traditional dichotomy between binding and persuasive authority, seeks to understand the distinction among prohibited, permissive, and mandatory legal sources, and attempts to explain the process by which so-called authorities gain (and sometimes lose) their authoritative status.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 94 / Issue 8  

There’s No Free Laugh (Anymore): The Emergence of Intellectual Property Norms and the Transformation of Stand-Up Comedy

By Dotan Oliar and Christopher Sprigman
94 Va. L. Rev. 1787

The Uneasy Case for Transjurisdictional Adjudication

By Jonathan R. Nash
94 Va. L. Rev. 1869

Authority and Authorities

By Frederick Schauer
94 Va. L. Rev. 1931

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez and Its Aftermath

By Jeffrey S. Sutton
94 Va. L. Rev. 1963