Making Good on Good Intentions

Article — Volume 95, Issue 8

95 Va. L. Rev. 1893
Download PDF

Recent employment discrimination law has focused on proposals to make it easier for plaintiffs to win Title VII cases when the circumstances underlying their claims are ambiguous. While some of the proposals are sound, they fail to take into account the costs of further legal presumptions and controls on people’s commitment to nondiscrimination goals – or what the article calls “good intentions.” Without such attention, reform efforts will gravitate toward strategies that (1) short-circuit the fundamental causation requirements of Title VII, increasing the risk of false positives and associated anxieties, (2) create a surveillance mentality, and (3) reduce people’s sense of autonomy, competence, and connectedness. The article brings together several strands of social science research to show that these effects weaken workplace trust, legitimacy, and acceptance of nondiscrimination norms. Although the increased pressure may produce compliance in the short term, the article contends that it may also undermine the affirmative commitment necessary over the long term to change the attitudes and beliefs that lead to present-day discrimination. Continued positive change requires not only strong nondiscrimination norms, but also conditions enabling people to internalize those norms. What promotes, or defeats, norm internalization is not an exact science, and is complicated by differences in individual and workplace circumstances. The article reviews the relevant social science literature and evaluates legal and workplace strategies for reducing workplace discrimination in light of it.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 95 / Issue 8  

Making Good on Good Intentions

By Katharine T. Bartlett
95 Va. L. Rev. 1893

The State of State Anti-takeover Law

By Michal Barzuza
95 Va. L. Rev. 1973

Incarceration, Accommodation, and Strict Scrutiny

By James Nelson
95 Va. L. Rev. 2053

Internet Radio: The Case for a Technology Neutral Royalty Standard

By Andrew Stockment
95 Va. L. Rev. 2129